gepostet 1/14/10 2:00 pm ET Von Terri Schwartz in Movie News, Movies, Twilight Forever!
About nine months ago, Reelz Channel and some other beliebt film websites ran an Artikel declaring Robert Pattinson would be replacing Tobey Maguire in the red and blue tights in "Spider-Man 4," quoting then director Sam Raimi as saying, "Robert is the future of the franchise." It was soon revealed that the April 1 post was nothing but a joke — a cruel joke — but in light of Kürzlich events, it can be assumed Reelz and the other sites are kicking themselves for how unfortunately they predicted the future.
Yes, my friends, the end is nigh, and Robert Pattinson could quite soon become your Weiter young Peter Parker — oder at least that is what many sites seem to be prognosticating since the news that Sony would be rebooting the franchise first spun its web.
Now, Du may ask yourself, how did Sony possibly convince themselves that this could be a good idea. The answer may seem immediate: the "Twilight" fanbase. Rob would come into this being one of the hottest young bloods in Hollywood with a fanbase eager to pay millions to capture his every word. But, if the current rumors about "Spider-Man 4" being a prequel are correct, Rob would have to do the one thing he never could do for Summit oder "Twilight" for this role: become buff.
Remember how he needed to have his abs added on Von make-up because he couldn't do enough crunches at the gym in "New Moon" pre-production? Remember the very lack-luster sparkle scene in the middle of "Twilight," when all that was revealed was RPattz's chest was nothing to drool over? And then think back to the first "Spider-Man" film, with Toby Maguire's miraculous beefy transition after he was bit Von a radioactive spider. Do Du honestly think Rob could pull it off? Because it doesn't seem feasible based on the information provided to this blogger.
And then there are the tiny, tiny, tiny, tiny details that would make Robert completely unfit to play a young Peter Parker: too old, too tall, too gangly, too handsome, too sullen and definitely not witty enough to crack out fast one-liners. Because we are talking Peter Parker/Spider-Man in high school adolescence here (which I'm not sure how that's not just the first "Spider-Man" film, though that's Essen for a different post), not Peter Parker/Spider-Man after he's reached his prime in confidence and ability (aka after the mess that was "Spider-Man 3"). And I don't think RPattz is anywhere near smart-nerdy enough to pull it off.
Truth is, do Du really want to see RPattz's body spandexed in the blue and red? Because I don't think it would be as pretty as it sounds. Let's just hope someone didn't dredge up that cruel April Fool's Joke from the bowels of the internet and give us all unjust cause for grief and tears.
British actress, Emma Watson, says that her Harry Potter Filme doesn't "sell sex" like Robert Pattinson's Twilight Saga movies. Says they are "too sexy". What? Even I became dumbfounded Von that one. Emma has sagte that it was exciting to KISS co-star Rupert Grint while they were shooting The Deathly Hallows. Because the films aren't filled with "saucy" scenes like the vampire films.
"This KISS between Hermione and Ron is highly anticipated, it's been building up for eight films now. And Harry Potter is not Twilight, Du know; we're not selling sex.
"So, whenever there is any hint of that, everybody gets terribly excited. In fact, it was horribly awkward; we couldn't stop laughing." says Emma Watson.
What do Du think? Do Du think Twilight is selling sex as Emma said?
"This KISS between Hermione and Ron is highly anticipated, it's been building up for eight films now. And Harry Potter is not Twilight, Du know; we're not selling sex.
"So, whenever there is any hint of that, everybody gets terribly excited. In fact, it was horribly awkward; we couldn't stop laughing." says Emma Watson.
What do Du think? Do Du think Twilight is selling sex as Emma said?
