Who played Mr. Wickham better? Umfrage Results - Stolz und Vorurteil

What do you think? Place your vote!

(Placed your vote already? Remember to login!)

Stolz und Vorurteil Who played Mr. Wickham better?

213 fans picked:

Rupert Friend (2005)

59%

Adrian Lukis (1995)

41%

kateliness2 posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr

Make your pick! | next poll >>

17 comments

	chel1395 picked Adrian Lukis (1995): Adrian Lukis was really good at being slimy. posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.

	kateliness2 picked Adrian Lukis (1995): Rupert Friend just seemed really uncomfortable around everything, after he married Lydia. Like he regretted it. Not "slimy" at all. More of a nice-guy-who-made-a-mistake. posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.

	momo_228 picked Rupert Friend (2005): ya i guess. but hes kinda hot... posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.

	DesertRose610 picked Rupert Friend (2005): Mr. Wickham was supposed to be handsome, charming and hiddenly-slimy! Adrian Lukis just isn't the role.. He is supposed to be hot!!! Before even considering how Wickham-ish they acted, Wickham is good-looking, ahhh.. ect. posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.

	Jillywinkles picked Adrian Lukis (1995): Adrian Lukis isn't bad-looking!! And he acted the part brilliantly. He was very smooth and charming, then slimy and deceitful. Rupert Friend just tried to be Orlando Bloom. posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr. last edited Vor mehr als einem Jahr

	orlabobs picked Adrian Lukis (1995): Defo Adrian Kukis.....he had that part exicuted.....the other guy doesnt even come into the same league! posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.

	deevdee picked Adrian Lukis (1995): lol at the orlando bloom thing, i noticed that! Adrian Lukis just seemed more believable to me posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.

	Act2liv picked Rupert Friend (2005): I like the orlando bloom thing. posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.

	zuntiz picked Adrian Lukis (1995): I thought of orlando too, and for me, that doesn't work for wickham. I think lukis is good, because he's really charming at first and then his slimy friend act, like he made a mistake and is sorry for it. posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr. last edited Vor mehr als einem Jahr

	lizziedarcy95 picked Adrian Lukis (1995): he was believable with his lies and actually looks like a snake posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.

	samjhart picked Adrian Lukis (1995): defo lukis. but have u not seen the guy who plays wickham in lost in austen. his name is tom riley. now that guy WAS good! he could blow friend out of the water (and he was jus as hot) posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.

	Freshonlybakery picked Adrian Lukis (1995): I love Rupert! But yeah, he isn't really creepy at all.. :) posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.

	pandp4eva picked Adrian Lukis (1995): Adrian did seem much slimier, and Rupert didn't really act like an evil, scheming guy. posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.

	BlackSandals picked Adrian Lukis (1995): He played that (evil) character better than Rupert, in my opinion :) posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.

	allis143 picked Rupert Friend (2005): Adrien Lukas made it blatantly obvious from the first minute his character was on screen that he wasn't to be trusted. I kept screaming at the screen "HE'S LYING! WHY CAN'T YOU SEE THAT!?" I mean, he's supposed to fool everyone by making them believe he's an honest man. Plus, I couldn't stand his "I Hate Darcy Campaign" in every scene he had. Rupert made him more deceitful and easier to trust, so he was believable. posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.

	DR76 picked Adrian Lukis (1995): Rupert Friend did nothing in the role of George Wickham. He was just there. It's not his fault. Joe Wright never gave him a chance to show what he could do. Adrian Lukis was BRILLIANT in the role of Mr. Wickham. He is the best Wickham I have ever seen. posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.

	xjiiu picked Rupert Friend (2005): 05 version was perfect, suave and handsome. 95 was creepy and kinda ugly, always with that weird smile. of course they did develop his character more, you don't get to see as much of him in 05, and rightly so as the movie was so many hours shorter! they had to cut out a whole lot of the "side characters" scenes. posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr.