Diese Frage beantworten

Harry Potter Frage

Do Du think Twilight is copying Harry Potter?(read the details first :))

Do Du think Twilight is copying Harry Potter, Von splitting(i think they are anyway) Breaking Dawn into two movies, like they are with Harry Potter? (:
*
Why are they splitting BD into two movies? It's a long book but...hardly anything happend...
Mrs-Grint posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
*
No but they want to steel Harry Potter success and I don't really like that
clarinette posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
*
in a way, yes. jump on bandwagon of movie that's already beliebt I guess. Hollywood want to harvest as much money they can get their hands on.
ClaireVoyant posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
 ABDCFan- posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
next question »

Harry Potter Antwort

cupcake219 said:
no its just a good way for film company's to make Mehr money, spreading it out Mehr so people have to pay more!
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
Shepard14 said:
Nah, Like the 7th Harry Potter Movie, there is so much detail that it would be a 5 Stunde movie....It is also a money-making decision...if someone like's the book's/movies enough, they'll pay for both. I am NOT siding with Twilight!!! I am a die-hard HP fan, I am just saying that i think it is unfair to ASSUME that they would copy. Who know's their reasons.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
oh, i wasn't assuming they were copying, i just wanted to know what everyones opinions were, and whether oder not they thought that Twilight was copying HP with the idea of splitting the last film into two movies. (:
ABDCFan- posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
*
hahaha i didn't mean to imply that Du were...sorry!
Shepard14 posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
*
ohh, it's fine! It's just because when Du put the capitals, i thought Du were implying that Du thought i was assuming! haha (:
ABDCFan- posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
*
It is my fault! I realize now that it looks that way! hahahah SORRY EVERYBODY!!
Shepard14 posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
HaleyDewit said:
I've seen the Sekunde Twilight movie and I thought it was a lot of crap.Harry Potter's still better.Nothing happened in Twilight.I almost fell asleep.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
i know! i watched it online, and i just was fast forwarding because i was bored out of my mind!
laughingGrl posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
*
Lol. I guess, i mean, the ending, everyone was like 'awww!' I was just like 'I knew that was coming, now lets get outta here, before the mad rush arrives!' hahaa. (:
ABDCFan- posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
Kylie90210 said:
Maybe they are, a little bit, they probably thought, 'hey, that's a good way to milch money out of our zombie fans!' but it's not like the idea was purely the creation of Warner Brother's. I haven't seen any Twilight movies, frankly, I wouldn't waste my time, but from what I've heard online, they don't have much to do in the last book anyway, so seeing how they are gonna stretch it out should be laughable.

That said, I am not impressed that Twilight wishes to compete so much with Harry Potter, first jumping on the original HBP release date, and now releasing one of their crappy Filme so soon after DH.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
XDRoseLuvsHP said:
I think they are. First off, what could they possibly put into two movies? There were few significant things in the book Breaking Dawn. Renesmee happened, Imprinting happened, Bella into vampire happened... and that's about it. I could say the Volturi thing happened, but nothing really did happen. Just pointless build up.

In Deathly Hallows, so much happened and all of it was really vital. The Seven Potters, The Wedding, Grimauld Place, The Ministry, The Woods, Godric's Hollow, Xenophilius Lovegood, Gringotts, The Final Battle (part 1 and 2), Malfoy Manner, Snape's Memory, The Sacrifice Harry has to make, The Epilogue, all of the deaths, finding the Horcruxes and the Sword of Gryffindor of course, even Dumbledore's Story has significance. That is just to name a few. Du have to fit that into the movies, and it's ALL important.

Also, it's pretty stupid to make the Twilight Filme come out RIGHT after the Harry Potter movies. Everyone knows Harry Potter Filme are the most successful movie series ever, and that is not opinion. That is statistics. That will, if anything, make them lose money.

It's all just too coincidental to me.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
i thin they are ecause he first was a really big pice of crap. im personally a HP fanand HP is so much Mehr awesome!!! i mean, vamprire, love, EUGH!! hater romance movies!
lovebaltor posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
cpluver153149 said:
Yes they r copying Harry potter b cuz when Cedric died he went to twilight as Edward and harry potter had him first
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
potterandtdi said:
Yeah! That's totally coying. TWILIGHTS TAKING OVER THE WORLD!
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
bellagirl24 said:
NO what do Vampire and Werwölfe have to do with wizards? Besides who cares how many Filme they make there awsome!
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
ikr!
zanesaaomgfan posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
*
haha. true, but Werwölfe will forever = remus lupin :)
laughingGrl posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
*
ikr?
ABDCFan- posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
*
oh! i know! lol, sorry, blank moment. And i didn't mean the content, i meant the idea of having 2 movies.
ABDCFan- posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
Jeffersonian said:
Why would they be copying? I mean just because they are splitting Breaking Dawn into two Filme doesn't mean they're copying.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
RealSunshine said:
I don't think they are copying!
They will teilt, split Breaking Down in 2 Filme because
the book has lots of details.
and I don't think Twilight needs to copy,ok,harry potter is like 100 time better,but twilight is trying to reach independence and to stop being compared with harry potter
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
zanesaaomgfan said:
No they aren't. Breaking Dawn is being put into two Filme because theres 2 parts. Bella's and Jacob's.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
but bella has two parts in the story, and inbetween those two parts, is Jacobs bit, and i don't understand how they're gonna put it into two movies, because Bellas parts are seperated, like i sagte before, Von Jacobs bit.
ABDCFan- posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
*
GAh 3 parts I meant,,,
zanesaaomgfan posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
EYBanuelos said:
Totally!
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
It really wasn't worth all the commotion they made about it
HaleyDewit posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
kayla1313 said:
yes i think they are
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
fugiami said:
honestly i think twilight is a crap movie and will never be as good as hp. i suppose they realize this and are trying to emulate hp.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
Hmm, yes, i agree. (:
ABDCFan- posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
BellatrixCissy said:
BD had barely anything but DH has sooooo much and look at HBP 2 1/2 hours BD could be that lenght anyway stupid copiers not fair not fair not fair:(
select as best answer
 BD had barely anything but DH has sooooo much and look at HBP 2 1/2 hours BD could be that lenght anyway stupid copiers not fair not fair not fair:(
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
summerlynn1978 said:
I think that they are copying. cause breaking dawnis the last book and deathly hallows is and they r both making it into 2 movies. deathly hallows planndd that first!
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
Magatha98 said:
No, they are not copying Harry Potter.
They need to cut it into 2 parts, because Filme arent supposed to be Mehr than 2 hours, and theres alot of detail in the books, so they need to put 2 parts!
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
if they;re meant to be 2 hours, and thats it, why are some movies, that have been shown in cinemas like 3 + 1/2 hours long?
ABDCFan- posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
LadyLilith said:
Personally, I think that Twilight copies off of a lot of beliebt literature. I know that there's probably only so much Du can do with a vampire falling in Liebe with a human, but STILL...Vampire Diaries, anyone? (Please consider only the book versions, I HATE the TV series).

If you're just talking about the last movies...hmm, slightly. It seems like they are trying to outdo HP in awesomeness (which would NEVER happen :) ), but it's too subtle of a coincidence. So who knows, really?
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
totally agree with u:)
vanillaicecream posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
NCISGleek said:
No, any good film maker would do it because it gets way Mehr detail and it would make the movie better.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
ToxicShock said:
No I don't think they are copying. If they where then all the other Bücher to Filme that are made into two films would be copying..example The Hobbit is going to be made into two films and I hardly doubt they would bother copying HP.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
ScottishChic said:
No. Both J.K. Rowling and Stehanie Meyer wrote a lot of things in their Bücher and both need a lot of them in it so, the directors need them in but they can't have like 5 Stunde Filme can they? So, they are doing the only thing they can- make the movie into two parts, which should be pretty cool either way
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
I agree with Du ScottishChic. :)
Kadaj posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
*
Awww thank ou Kadaj, thats sweet of Du to say so xx
ScottishChic posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
KreachersArmy said:
Of course they are copying. They saw a good idea and they took it. Just like they are making a Twilight version of Pottermore now. But unlike Deathly Hallows, Twilight doesn't have enough content to fill 2 movies. Breaking Dawn is gonna be soooo slow. I thinking that Meyers may have started the HP/Twihard comparison herself to be honest.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
next question »