Diese Frage beantworten

Harry Potter Frage

Frage about Harry Potter plothole?

Du know that basilisk fangs can kill horcruxes, and Du know that harry is a horcrux. Well, just when harry kills the basilisk, a fang sinks into his arm, so even though fawkes gave her tears, I would have thought he should have been destroyed before then?

 TangoThang posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
next question »

Harry Potter Antwort

princesslullaby said:
But remember that the Horcrux is a piece of Voldemort's soul. While in the other Horcruxes, his soul is put into an inanimate object, therefore being the only live substance in it, and can be directly stabbed, when it's in an actual person, it's protected Von the other person's soul and other life parts.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
i was gonna write ta same thing....u beat me to ta schlagen, punsch :)
Bubba38 posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
LadyNottingham said:
Fawkes came to Harry's rescue and shed tears so quick that the venom did not have the time to reach vital organs and kill the boy. Basilisc poison is lethal enough to kill a human body before it can even kill the soul.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
Exactamundo.
BlackHound posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
cunha27 said:
Hmm, good question. Maybe it's not Harry himself who'd the Horcrux, but his scar?...and the basilisk fang needed to have come in contact with the scar either directly oder Von the poison being eventually dispersed through Harry's body oder having Harry die?...I don't know...

Though if that was the case and knowing that the poison did not kill immediately, Dumbledore should have gotten some phoenix tears ready, collected a fang, summoned Harry and destroyed the Horcrux in Harry himself
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
I always interpreted it to mean that the horcrux was in the scar, also.
karenmiller1972 posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
next question »