Diese Frage beantworten

Zufällig Frage

If Du had to chose between being stoic towards everything and being emotional towards everything, which one would Du choose?

 CokeTheUmbreon posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
next question »

Zufällig Antwort

cosmic_fusions said:
i could never be stoic
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
^Me neither. Glad I'm not the only one 'round here who gets emotional (from time to time).
BJsRealm posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
zanhar1 said:
Stoic.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
BJsRealm said:
I don't know. I'm way too emotional myself. I often act on impulse, regretting everything the very Weiter second. People think that I'm cold, heartless & calculated, without any human emotions whatsoever. Believe me, nothing could be further from the truth in my case! Thank God I'm a pacifist myself. What can I say, sometimes it's best to keep your feelings to yourself, on some other occasions, it's best to let everyone know exactly how Du feel at the moment. Guess Du can say it all depends on the situation. That's not much of an answer, I know, but it's the best possible answer I could come up with on such short notice. Hope Du like it.
select as best answer
 I don't know. I'm way too emotional myself. I often act on impulse, regretting everything the very Weiter second. People think that I'm cold, heartless & calculated, without any human emotions whatsoever. Believe me, nothing could be further from the truth in my case! Thank God I'm a pacifist myself. What can I say, sometimes it's best to keep your feelings to yourself, on some other occasions, it's best to let everyone know exactly how Du feel at the moment. Guess Du can say it all depends on the situation. That's not much of an answer, I know, but it's the best possible answer I could come up with on such short notice. Hope Du like it.
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
SilentForce said:
Stoic
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
BlindBandit92 said:
Stoic
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
EgoMouse said:
Considering I can be extremes on both side, I would say both sides have fucked me over and I rather just be neutral with a hint of emotional.
....But I guess Mehr stoic.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
Lavendergolden said:
I guess stoic. I sure am a bit of an emotional person, but I want tog get hurt lesser
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
Ranty-cat said:
In philosophy, while stoicism is Mehr about resilience and logic, it doesn’t imply emotionlessness at all.

It is emotional control in it's highest form. It is not that one does not feel pain but is the fact that they can control their sense of it oder their emotional and physical reaction to it making them appear emotionless.

In this context, if your definition of the term stoic is merely "emotionless", and Du are using it synonymously, then my answer would be I would rather be emotional because the world will feel hollow once Du lose all of your emotions. Du will neither feel the positive emotions, nor the negative ones. I want to feel and experience all those beautiful moments and feelings and many events that made me feel so happy and different range of emotions that I am glad that I had. I'd rather have emotions and learn how to control them instead of not having any emotions at all.


select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
Nick3600 said:
wtf is stoic? is that how a stroke victim says the word stroke? It would be pretty inconvenient if i got a stroke just Von looking at everything
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
next question »