Well, I've noticed recently, that people have been talking about the Animation of the Disney Princess Filme recently, Mehr so the difference between 2D and CGI Disney Princess movies, as well as some other things.
Most seem to think 2D is better. Well, Mehr than most, almost all actually. I too Liebe the 2D Animation from the Disney Princess movies, it looks great, especially in some of the movies, however, I think people are starting to overrate the 2D movies, at least on fanpop.
Outside of fanpop, the matter is completely different. The CGI Filme are loved and praised Von many, especially young children. They have gegeben Disney the most success, and the reviews for their CGI (Disney Princess) movies, are mostly solid. So.. It sounds like the CGI Filme are overrated outside of Fanpop right? Well, yep, kind of at the least.
However, with fanpop, it's a different story. On here, a lot of people here grew up watching Filme like "Cinderella" "Beauty and the Beast" "The Little Mermaid" "Mulan" and others. So, we can put nostalgia up there as well, Wird angezeigt how most of us grew up as young kids watching 2D Disney Films, not the CGI ones. Well, nostalgia plays a part in why Du may like the 2D films better, whether you've noticed that oder not. You'll always have a soft spot for the Filme that have the Animation style of your favorite, oder the movie Du grew up watching over and over again.
Many people also consider 2D Filme to have Mehr "realistic" animation. Well, this really depends on which one you're talking about. There are some Disney Princesses, like Mulan, that actually look like real teenagers. Others? Just not quite as much. Now to CGI. Do these Filme have realistic character designs? Well, some of them don't exactly look like real people, and many characters have exaggerated features. Take Kristoff's huge nose for example. Well, in our minds, it's actually easier to relate to characters that are Mehr realistic looking. So, is that why people relate to Mulan so much Mehr than Elsa? Well, partly, that and the part that Mulan has a larger character development.
But, is character Design ALL that Du look for in a Disney Princess movie? Well, I sure hope not. There are things like plot, characters, and development that come to mind. I honestly don't think any of the Disney Princess Filme fully miss the mark when it comes to that, even Frozen, which I have ranted on about the characters before.
Next, overrating. Many people tend to dislike Frozen just because it is overrated. If it didn't get any attention, would people like it more? In my opinion, the answer is yes. It will have its haters, but there definitely wouldn't be as many hate rants as there were before. Many people tend to dislike Frozen for being overrated, and then praise The Princess and the Frog, because it didn't get as much attention. Many people think the hand-drawn films are better because they got less attention. But, when Du think about it, the hand-drawn films get tons of attention too. It's just that our minds tend to overlook it, because our Favoriten tend to be hand-drawn movies.
Overall, does the Animation REALLY matter most in a movie? Nope. It's like judging a book Von it's cover. Looking at a trailer and saying "This is CGI, why bother watching it?" is basically judging a book Von it's cover, just in a movie's case. It's okay to dislike a CGI movie, but reasons are better than just saying "CGI just can't compare to 2D." How is that proving your point at all? And how can people agree with Du for listing no point? Nostalgia, the look of the animation, the character designs.. Those are the first things that come to mind. But then, Du should think again. What about plot, what about character development? That's what's really important after all.
Anyways, what are your opinions on this? Do Du think that 2D is better than CGI, oder reversed? Why do Du think one is better?
Most seem to think 2D is better. Well, Mehr than most, almost all actually. I too Liebe the 2D Animation from the Disney Princess movies, it looks great, especially in some of the movies, however, I think people are starting to overrate the 2D movies, at least on fanpop.
Outside of fanpop, the matter is completely different. The CGI Filme are loved and praised Von many, especially young children. They have gegeben Disney the most success, and the reviews for their CGI (Disney Princess) movies, are mostly solid. So.. It sounds like the CGI Filme are overrated outside of Fanpop right? Well, yep, kind of at the least.
However, with fanpop, it's a different story. On here, a lot of people here grew up watching Filme like "Cinderella" "Beauty and the Beast" "The Little Mermaid" "Mulan" and others. So, we can put nostalgia up there as well, Wird angezeigt how most of us grew up as young kids watching 2D Disney Films, not the CGI ones. Well, nostalgia plays a part in why Du may like the 2D films better, whether you've noticed that oder not. You'll always have a soft spot for the Filme that have the Animation style of your favorite, oder the movie Du grew up watching over and over again.
Many people also consider 2D Filme to have Mehr "realistic" animation. Well, this really depends on which one you're talking about. There are some Disney Princesses, like Mulan, that actually look like real teenagers. Others? Just not quite as much. Now to CGI. Do these Filme have realistic character designs? Well, some of them don't exactly look like real people, and many characters have exaggerated features. Take Kristoff's huge nose for example. Well, in our minds, it's actually easier to relate to characters that are Mehr realistic looking. So, is that why people relate to Mulan so much Mehr than Elsa? Well, partly, that and the part that Mulan has a larger character development.
But, is character Design ALL that Du look for in a Disney Princess movie? Well, I sure hope not. There are things like plot, characters, and development that come to mind. I honestly don't think any of the Disney Princess Filme fully miss the mark when it comes to that, even Frozen, which I have ranted on about the characters before.
Next, overrating. Many people tend to dislike Frozen just because it is overrated. If it didn't get any attention, would people like it more? In my opinion, the answer is yes. It will have its haters, but there definitely wouldn't be as many hate rants as there were before. Many people tend to dislike Frozen for being overrated, and then praise The Princess and the Frog, because it didn't get as much attention. Many people think the hand-drawn films are better because they got less attention. But, when Du think about it, the hand-drawn films get tons of attention too. It's just that our minds tend to overlook it, because our Favoriten tend to be hand-drawn movies.
Overall, does the Animation REALLY matter most in a movie? Nope. It's like judging a book Von it's cover. Looking at a trailer and saying "This is CGI, why bother watching it?" is basically judging a book Von it's cover, just in a movie's case. It's okay to dislike a CGI movie, but reasons are better than just saying "CGI just can't compare to 2D." How is that proving your point at all? And how can people agree with Du for listing no point? Nostalgia, the look of the animation, the character designs.. Those are the first things that come to mind. But then, Du should think again. What about plot, what about character development? That's what's really important after all.
Anyways, what are your opinions on this? Do Du think that 2D is better than CGI, oder reversed? Why do Du think one is better?
I'm not strictly doing these in chronological order, it's just a coincidence that I chose Ariel next. Du might think Ariel isn't a Mary Sue because of her obvious flaws that a lot people hate her for, but I think she still could be. Mary Sues can have flaws (hence why that trait doesn't just say "No flaws" and nothing else). So let's see.
Unique traits without contacts oder hair dye- Sort of. Red hair is common enough, but her shade of red definitely isn't. .5
An odd name- Sort of. 'Ariel' is common enough Von mermaid standards, but she's the only one of her siblings with a name not ending...
continue reading...
Unique traits without contacts oder hair dye- Sort of. Red hair is common enough, but her shade of red definitely isn't. .5
An odd name- Sort of. 'Ariel' is common enough Von mermaid standards, but she's the only one of her siblings with a name not ending...
Wow, I'm on a role with these tests. I look up clips from the Filme for these (though I don't have enough patience to watch the full movies, just the parts relating to the traits). I found the whole of Snow White and the Seven Dwarves on Youtube...presumably. It was just a cut and edited version of the movie played multiple times to make it look like the full movie. Still, it gave me enough information.
Unique traits without contacts oder hair dye- No. Her "hair as black as ebony" and brown eyes are common.
An odd name- Yes. 'Snow White' isn't a name you'd find in anyone in real life, or...
continue reading...
Unique traits without contacts oder hair dye- No. Her "hair as black as ebony" and brown eyes are common.
An odd name- Yes. 'Snow White' isn't a name you'd find in anyone in real life, or...
After doing the Mehr modern princesses, I switched to the classics, who are accused of being Mary Sues a lot. (I might not do ones for Merida and Tiana, since they pretty obviously aren't Mary Sues). Starting with Cinderella.
Unique traits without contacts oder hair dye- No. She has blonde hair and blue eyes, common traits.
An odd name- Yes. It'd make sense if it was explained Aschenputtel was a nickname and her real name is Ella, like in some versions, but it isn't in the film. 1.
Looks constantly Kommentiert on- Yes. Aschenputtel is described as beautiful, and the prince considers her the most...
continue reading...
Unique traits without contacts oder hair dye- No. She has blonde hair and blue eyes, common traits.
An odd name- Yes. It'd make sense if it was explained Aschenputtel was a nickname and her real name is Ella, like in some versions, but it isn't in the film. 1.
Looks constantly Kommentiert on- Yes. Aschenputtel is described as beautiful, and the prince considers her the most...
Her eyes are violet in this pic, but what about the scene she woke up from sleeping? She had blue eyes. And what about the scene she was dancing? She had black eyes.
I liked Mulan very much because she was a Merida - Legende der Highlands girl who thought of her family and homeland. However, I admit that Mulan is a little ugly and is at the bottom of my beauty list. Some things that make this girl ugly. That is the subject of this article. And if Du disagree with me, just state it in the comments. Du don't need to hate me.
1- Eyebrows
Mulan's ugliest limb is her eyebrows. Mulan's eyebrows are too thick. They also rise much higher than they should. Fortunately, Mulan's eyes are so beautiful that she can hide the ugliness of the eyebrows in some photos.
2- Eyes and hair (when male)
Mulan looks beautiful with slim eyes and makeup, but I can't understand how she looks so big and ugly when she puts her hair in a bun and turns into a man. The shape of the hair she turned into a man does not suit her at all.
1- Eyebrows
Mulan's ugliest limb is her eyebrows. Mulan's eyebrows are too thick. They also rise much higher than they should. Fortunately, Mulan's eyes are so beautiful that she can hide the ugliness of the eyebrows in some photos.
2- Eyes and hair (when male)
Mulan looks beautiful with slim eyes and makeup, but I can't understand how she looks so big and ugly when she puts her hair in a bun and turns into a man. The shape of the hair she turned into a man does not suit her at all.
