She was made by 20th Century Fox

true, but she is still a princess, althought technically a Dutchess =)

what Euri and sheepprncss3 said....

I agree with Euri shes not disney !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

what everone else said but shes still roaltiy

She is a princess but she is not disney. shes the daughter of the czar, whicH is a princESS OF SORTS.

While she is a princess, she is not a princess in a DISNEY movie, which means she is not a DISNEY PRINCESS. She is just an animated princess.

I wish she was-almost no kid knows of her!

She's not disney, so why would she be a DISNEY princess?

She is royal, but she isnt disney and it is extremely unlikely for disney to incorparate an animated character created by another company in to their disney princess franchise

She is royalty, but she isn't a princess, and she is actually from 20th Century Fox, not Disney.

I don't

she is a 20th Century Fox princess

This question is dumb.

i agree she's a WB princess

fox

Not WB, FOX

i know that she is disney princess only...........:)

^What? She definitly isn't

It would have been nice if she was a Disney princess, since Disney have a lot of movies based of fairytales, and Anastasia is based on a well-known legend.

She belongs to Fox in cartoon form, but she was a real girl too. She was killed in the Russian Revolution of 1917. They found her remains - it's a fact now.

^ Yeah, what Straggy said.

I havent seen the movie so I dont know.

мне вообще да же не нравиться

^ I try to translate that online but it still doesn't make sense. What?

But yeah, the movie Anastasia is from 20th Century Fox, so she's not a Disney princess.

She isn't Disney at all. The real story about her is sad. : [

Of course she isn`t a Disney character.

she was a real russian princess. x

shes defintely not a Disney Princess>_<

^Dreamworks?!?!?
She was made by 20th Century Fox

no she is 20th century fox.

OMG! So many people picked Warner Brothers and Disney!

why do so many people picked warner bros?? XD she is from fox, made by don bluth, but the story is based on the real anastasia, who was the youngest daughter of zar nikolai II

If the movie was disney she would be part of the line.

She's from 20th Century Fox, made by someone named Don Bluth in cartoon form. She was also a real person from Russia who was killed at the age of seventeen. She has a very sad past.... I found out when I was ten or eleven from reading The Royal Diaries. Just watched the cartoon for the first time yesterday at four AM.

This is such a stupid question! Obviously she's a russian princess/dutchess. Don't believe me? Search "Grand Dutchess Anastasia" on google. You'll find the wiki. Click it, read Anastasia's page. See?

I agree with defyingglory

Yes, she was a Russian princess (technically a Duchess) but she is not a Disney, Dreamworks, WB or some other random company princess. She is 20th Century Fox. Look on the case of the movie.

As well as a Russian Princess, though her true title is Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolovena Romanov.

Ok she's a Russian grand duchess, and the fantastically 2-D animation version of her is 20th Century Fox's

Exactly.

I always think the Anastasia is a Disney princess. But Don Bluth and Gary Goldman used to work at Disney they work on The Many Adventures Of Winnie The Pooh, Sleeping Beauty, Robin Hood and The Fox And The Hound. So I think Anastasia is a Disney princess. Right?

both

It is very true, that I never heard of her!

Shes a disney princess.

^no, she definitely isn't