Diese Frage beantworten

True Blood Frage

When Eric silvercuffed himself to Russell Von daylight, wasn't Russell supposed to burn faster?

I mean, in season 2, Godric told Sookie before dying that, since he was old, he was going to burn very fast and he was right. But Russell, being like 1000 years older than Godric did not burn fast even if he was out Von daylight during a much longer time than Godric. I understand he drank Sookie's blood but isn't he supposed to burn faster than Eric (which didn't seem to be the case) even if Eric was out Von daylight before him (considering Eric is younger than him)?
 Mrs-X posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
next question »

True Blood Antwort

Azoe said:
No, I dont think so.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
*
I mean... Maybe your right. Lol, Idk :)
Azoe posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
*
LOL oh kay ^^
Mrs-X posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
trueblood17 said:
haha yeah that's true
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
ChavaTzeit said:
You're right! I asked myself the same question: Why did Godric die in a lovely green light and disappeared altogether without appearing to suffer while Russel burnt like a toast. Just a mistake Von the writers of the Zeigen I guess.
select as best answer
 You're right! I asked myself the same question: Why did Godric die in a lovely green light and disappeared altogether without appearing to suffer while Russel burnt like a toast. Just a mistake Von the writers of the Zeigen I guess.
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
Sam192013 said:
I ask myself that same Frage every time I watch that episode. From what I understand the older Du are the faster Du burn, I understand that Sookie's blood may be strong but he should have been burning at least as fast as Eric because Eric is 2000 years younger than him and he had already been out there longer.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
next question »