Harry Potter oder Twilight
What do you think? Place your vote!
(Placed your vote already? Remember to login!)
Harry Potter oder Twilight Vampire oder Wizards?
278 fans picked: |
|
wizards!Magic beats all!
|
|||
Vampire obviously.They're totally hot!
|
|
Make your pick! | next poll >> |
"Avada Kedavra"
Now your all dead. Or should I torture you Twilight fans out of your brainwashed minds?
"Crucio.."
Also if I was a witch I'd be able to do cool spells and fly on a broomstick.
And I don't want sparkly skin either.
I rest my case.
Vampire=Living forever
Wizard=Living for a short time(compared to forever), but having LOADS of fun
i'd defo. prefer being a wizard. :)
Wizards FTW. :)
ABDCFan: So agree with you! Who would take living forever in angst and boredom having to kill innocent animals daily over living as a wizard, going to Hogwarts, being able to do so many cool things and having fun?
Also, as Mrs-Grint said, if you were a wizard and wanted to live forever, just get a Philosopher's Stone, whip up The Elixir of Life, and you're done! Much better than drinking animal blood. (Of course, if you REALLY wanted to, Twilight fans, you could always drink unicorn blood, seeing as you don't mind killing innocent beings, or you could even make some horcruxes, seeing as you don't mind maiming your souls...)
Oh, and you'd have to put up with a HUGE amount of shitty one-hit wonders.
one life is enough if you live it well
*imperio - you can command them to die or something
*incendio - LOL, buuuuurn vampires.
They are more...seductive.
1- Being dead, being cold, never able to sleep, living forever at the age of 18 and worst being forever in the high school, can't taste food and glittering in the sun, wants to suck blood, sucking blood
or
2-go to school in Hogwarts, get aged, being alive, being warm, can do magic, can learn magic, can sleep, can taste food, can even make food or something else using magic
Than I think I choose the second one ;-)
CharmedVamp101 answers : "phi, you're an idiot. You can't become a vampire, unless you're bitten by one."
That is plain stupid CharmedVamp101. Vamp101 huh!?! But there was obviously a first vampire, right? Who bit him? In his novel, Bram Stoker considered his Dracula the first vampire ever. But it was way after Carlisle, Aro and all were already created. So let's disregard the man who brought vampires to the mainstream and read Meyer. In her books, there had always been vampires and when you are bitten you become a vampire. She doesn't actually write that you HAVE TO be bitten to become one. If the wizarding world were to collide with Twilight, I bet that you could cast a spell on yourself to become a vampire! Even if you can't you just have to get bitten... I mean : easy!
But I bet no Harry Potter wants to become a vampire, the twilight way. Killing to survive... Can't go out in the sun... Immortality... No thanks. I'd rather be a wizard and go out on a sunny to look for ingredients to make my philosopher's stone, then go to a gastronomic restaurant, and live along life, deciding when it is time to die! Doesn't it sound awesome, or what!?!
CharmedVamp101 answers : "phi, you're an idiot. You can't become a vampire, unless you're bitten by one."
So, what you're saying is(secretly) that you wish you were a wizard, because wizards are special, and vampires are a dime-a-dozen (plus have no special powers besides, what, long life and superstrength)? Or, you could be a wizard, and be like "Hey, Vamp, you gonna suck my blood? Oh no you don't, Avada Kedavara!"
Anmelden oder bei Fanpop registrieren, um Deinen Kommentar hinzuzufügen