Diese Frage beantworten

Harry Potter oder Twilight Frage

Do Du think that PART 2 is nesasary?

If Du don't all ready know that I'm talking about Harry Potter Part 2. I think it nesasary to have it But most people think they don't need it. They say it all ready tells the main story line and they just want money. What do Du think?
 spongebob105 posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr
next question »

Harry Potter oder Twilight Antwort

bri-marie said:
I think it was definitely neccessary. Not only does DH have it's own heavy climax and resolution, it also ties up all the last six books. There's just too much to squeez into a two and-a-half Stunde movie.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
youknowit101 said:
I think it's necessary. A lot happens that can't fit into two hours. They could have cut some details, but that would leave too many unexplained, loose ends.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
xDark_Angelx said:
I believe it is completely necessary. There's too much vital information in lots of chapters to be skipped Von due to short time Von having one part. "Order of the Phoenix" was a long book, and look how it turned out in theatres, with all that shortened time. So, they know now that it's best for them to separate the book into two movie parts to keep as much stuff from the Bücher as they can.
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
Sandfire_Paiger said:
I think it is very necasary! They already released Part 1. Now they need Part 2. And Du don't know what happens unless you've already read the book! Lots of Harry Potter Fans I know haven't!
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
HarryPotterFan5 said:
I think it is,why not? Those people don't experence the thrill of Harry Potter!
select as best answer
posted Vor mehr als einem Jahr 
next question »