Why is The Rescuers sequel in Disney Renaissance?

I have a Frage for you; have Du even SEEN Rescuers Down Under? It is even better than the original! Also, the movie came out in 1990, between The Little Mermaid and Beauty and the Beast, making it part of the Renaissance physically. And technically, it is part of the Renaissance and the Animated Classics Canon because it was actually made Von the Walt Disney Animation Studios themselves, instead of Toon Disney. Also, Fantasia 2000 and Winnie the Pooh are part of the Animated Classics canon; why are Du not complaining about them?

It's because The Rescuers Down Under is actually a canon film, whereas direct-to-video sequels are not. Disney only considers films that were made Von the Walt Disney Animation Studios to be part of their animated canon. :)

The Rescuers Down Under is a sequel, but it was made Von Walt Disney Animation Studios in the time of the Renaissance. It is a part if the Renaissance up to a certain extent. It did not make a lot of money and because of that, it is ignored. It does not have songs like the rest of the other films, and because of this film's reception, the stopped making sequels