I saw the movie yesterday too and I was expecting huge line-ups and teenage girls who'd skipped school (saw it around 1 pm) but the theatre was almost empty for starters and seemed to be filled with people like myself, older and strangely drawn and curious though not die-hard fans.
All and all, I think they did well with the material. It's not easy to make a compelling movie when you've got a strangely written book and bizarrely motivated characters to work with.
I think Taylor Lautner has come a long way, but still seems to struggle a bit with the really serious, emotional scenes. And I was as confused by his character in the movie as I am with him in the book, so I guess that makes sense.
Kristen Stewart did amazingly well in this film and I can't imagine what it would have been like without her strong acting. She seems to be really trying to figure Bella out and the fact that she gets how selfish and obsessive she is and is playing her exactly how flawed she is written is pretty incredible.
I think Robert Pattinson deserves a break. If you think about the book, his character isn't really that dynamic - not until Stephenie Meyer started writing "Midnight Sun" did we really get his whole deal so I think he's supposed to be reserved and pained and acting in a very subtle way. Especially in this film because I think we're supposed to experience the contrast between the dead, sullen, difficult lives of the vampires and the warm, fun-loving pack-oriented wolves. I think it's part of the ploy to move the audience towards the wolves, as Bella does, in an understanding way, rather than us all being resentful of them.
I guess the disappointing part of the film for me was that I wasn't blown away or excited visually by anything. We'd seen the wolves and Italy and the kiss and the Volturi in previews and teasers, so there was nothing that really wowed me about it (other than all the pretty, sculpted men, of course.) I also missed the aesthetic of the first film and was distracted by the creepiness of the vampire's eyes (the gold, not the red.) I mean, if we're meant to relate to the characters in a realistic way and, if we're meant to believe they could exist among us, giving them all distracting supernatural eyes is not going to allow that to happen.
I guess the part I feel they've really missed the boat on in these films is the raw, obsessive, self-hating, pained emotions that these fucked up characters experience and that though I don't believe for a second that Stephenie Meyer purposefully or with any intelligent forethought created them that way (I mean, let's face it, the writing is pretty poor by any standard) it's what you have to read into them to be able to understand their insane actions. So, it's not a wonder that people who haven't read the books or those who aren't fans think the movies are stupid because without enough screen time spent exploring the depth of their issues, all of their actions seem disturbingly unfounded.
Final point, killer soundtrack, nice work.
All and all, I think they did well with the material. It's not easy to make a compelling movie when you've got a strangely written book and bizarrely motivated characters to work with.
I think Taylor Lautner has come a long way, but still seems to struggle a bit with the really serious, emotional scenes. And I was as confused by his character in the movie as I am with him in the book, so I guess that makes sense.
Kristen Stewart did amazingly well in this film and I can't imagine what it would have been like without her strong acting. She seems to be really trying to figure Bella out and the fact that she gets how selfish and obsessive she is and is playing her exactly how flawed she is written is pretty incredible.
I think Robert Pattinson deserves a break. If you think about the book, his character isn't really that dynamic - not until Stephenie Meyer started writing "Midnight Sun" did we really get his whole deal so I think he's supposed to be reserved and pained and acting in a very subtle way. Especially in this film because I think we're supposed to experience the contrast between the dead, sullen, difficult lives of the vampires and the warm, fun-loving pack-oriented wolves. I think it's part of the ploy to move the audience towards the wolves, as Bella does, in an understanding way, rather than us all being resentful of them.
I guess the disappointing part of the film for me was that I wasn't blown away or excited visually by anything. We'd seen the wolves and Italy and the kiss and the Volturi in previews and teasers, so there was nothing that really wowed me about it (other than all the pretty, sculpted men, of course.) I also missed the aesthetic of the first film and was distracted by the creepiness of the vampire's eyes (the gold, not the red.) I mean, if we're meant to relate to the characters in a realistic way and, if we're meant to believe they could exist among us, giving them all distracting supernatural eyes is not going to allow that to happen.
I guess the part I feel they've really missed the boat on in these films is the raw, obsessive, self-hating, pained emotions that these fucked up characters experience and that though I don't believe for a second that Stephenie Meyer purposefully or with any intelligent forethought created them that way (I mean, let's face it, the writing is pretty poor by any standard) it's what you have to read into them to be able to understand their insane actions. So, it's not a wonder that people who haven't read the books or those who aren't fans think the movies are stupid because without enough screen time spent exploring the depth of their issues, all of their actions seem disturbingly unfounded.
Final point, killer soundtrack, nice work.