I prefer Return to Neverland to Peter Pan. I have a love-hate thing for Peter Pan. The sequel, while not all that original nor phenomenal, is likable. It doesn't insult the viewer's intelligence and it captures emotion very well.

Tbh I don't really care that much for Don Bluth's films. Everybody always goes on and on about how Secret of NIMH is a masterpiece but I just find it to be cute.

This isn't all that unpopular, thankfully.
I think it's awful when people bash the bodies of animated characters.
Example: Being a huge Naruto fan, I go online and come across people arguing over whether Hinata or Sakura is better and using their appearances as reasons to dislike them, a.k.a. Sakura has a flat chest therefore she's ugly, Hinata is curvy therefore she's a slut, etc. I know, characters are constantly objectified (us Fanpoppers even do it sometimes) but using the appearances of the characters to bash them seems immature at best.
Edit: Now that I think about it, the particular show I mentioned does have some perverted characters, so it isn't as if the comments I don't like really come out of nowhere.

It's disgusting, in my opinion. This goes for real life, too. Body-shaming isn't right in my book.
My apologies if I offend anyone with this.

Malificent isn't that impressive of a villian tbh. Okay, so what if she caused a riot just because she wan't invited? Why does she even care so much about not being invited anyway? Would she even be so much of a bad ass if she couldn't transform into a dragon?I'll give her props for not having the power/money motive though.

Anastasia is an okay movie with great animation and songs, but the main reason I like watching it is because of Russian history and culture. I don't really care much for the characters (Yeah I know that has been said many times on this spot, but my main point here isn't to complain about the characters. Just having a different reason.)

I refuse to believe that Ariel is Danish, Rapunzel is German or whatever nationality people claim the classic DPs to be. In their movies it never mentions, where the setting takes place nor are there any cultural references. Just because Hans Christian Anderson was Danish doesn't mean Ariel is. Her place doesn't even look Scandinavian. Also the castle is based on somewhere in France I think. It's an ambiguous European setting! By that logic, Aladddin must be in China because it comes from an originally Chinese fairytale. I will believe Frozen takes place in Norway though because I see a lot of Scandinavian references in there.

I like how Sebastian says "Ariel".
Arielle. :)

Okay, I'm probably beating a dead horse here, but I just DO NOT GET why fandom tends to compete between female characters, and always go and be biased towards one group of female characters. It's often the same thing, the fandom going around making "articles" about who are the best female characters and as usual, they'll only talk positively about the "HUR DUR MAH STRONG UNEMOTIONAL TOMBOYS WHO KICK BUTT AND AREN'T LIKE THOSE LAME GIRLY GIRLS HERP DERP! THEY'RE WHAT A REAL WOMAN SHOULD BE!!!" Characters like Black Widow, Buttercup, Molly Grue or Ruki Makino get a lot of undeserved praise for doing very little in the story but always having a "sassy"/rude-bitchy attitude or being more tomboyish than the other female characters around them (Alright, Ruki and Widow DO stuff in the story, but I hate how abrasive their fans get and how often they shit on the girly characters like Wanda or Mimi just to make the previous two look better). It seems the more feminine or nice a female character is, the more hate she gets (I'm not talking about damsels in distress, if you're wondering).

Isn't it in a way misogynistic to idolize women who take on more masculine attitudes while dismissing traditionally feminine women? After all, the point of being feministic is allowing a woman to do what she wants to do, and accept any type of woman, right?

What is the most offensive is people going around saying "THIS IS WHAT WOMEN SHOULD BE. SUCH A ROLE MODEL!". You never see male characters going around with that "THIS IS WHAT MEN SHOULD BE" mentality.

I'm not saying we shouldn't have tomboy characters. They're interesting characters to handle and like i said, there's no wrong way of being a woman. What we DO need to drop is this competitive attitude that we give to female characters, and this harmful idea that femininity is somehow "stupid" or outdated.

I hate how most human characters look in CGI, they look like toys imo, like they're made out of wood or plastic.

I feel like like Im the only person here that cares about the female gaze. Theres WAYYYY too much male gaze everywhere. There needs to more stuff for the ladies to enjoy.

I want When Marnie was There (Ghibli) to gain more recognition. It doesn't have to win awards and be as popular as The Lion King or even Spirited Away, I just want more people to watch it and make their own judgments. I understand that it's somewhat new and not easy to find online in good quality or with subtitles, I just hope it succeeds in the future. I am happy to say that most of the reviews I've seen are positive.

I refuse to believe that Princess Jasmine is 15 years old. Honestly, I've only seen that stated on wiki pages and random people on the internet. Maybe if Disney confirmed it. I just think she looks and acts older than 15. Yeah, I get that it's not supposed to be realistic, but many of the other DPs (in my opinion anyway) for the most part look and act their stated ages.

I HATE the designs of the dragons in How To Train Your Dragons. The dragons don't look like freaking dragons! If I hear the whole "How can you say they don't looks like dragons when dragons don't exist," bull crap argument one more time I'm going to choke the hell out of them! Mermaids don't exist but I know what they're supposed to look like. These don't look like dragons, they look more like glorified, overgrown chameleons. Yes, they're "unique" designs but that doesn't mean they're not terrible designs. I hate how people think that just because someone is different and more unique from the "cookie cutter look" that it makes them appealing looking, even if they're horribly designed and unattractive (example, Meg from Hercules). If I had seen these dragons for the first time and no one told me they were dragons, I never in a million years would've guessed that they were dragons AT ALL and that thoughts would be COMPLETELY FAR AWAY from my mind. It's one of the reasons I hate the movie.

I prefer Odette over Anastasia

I've probably already said this but I don't care, I'll say it anyway lol. I think that The Swan Princess is objectively a good movie. Yes, there are things that aren't logical in it but that's because it's a story that relies more on emotion than logic, like a true fairy-tale does. Most of the "plot-holes" in this movie were in the original Swan Lake, so blame the original source material. I love the characters, the animation is beautiful (especially considering what a small budget it had), the romance is amazing (if you wanna see me defend it, go look at my Sleeping Beauty vs The Swan Princess article), the villain is great, and the music is phenomenal and memorable. I'm not just saying I think it's objectively good just because of my nostalgia for it because there are things from my childhood that I loved as a kid and now don't think are objectively good (whether or not I still like them or if I dislike them now). I mean the Sam Raimi Spider-man movies, the Tom and Jerry Movie, Cinderella 2, Belle's Magical World, Atlantis 2, Hercules, Sharkboy and Lavagirl, Power Rangers: The Movie, Pokemon: The First Movie, Shrek The Third, The Hunchback of Notre Dame 2, The Fox and The Hound 2, Tarzan 2, The Pebble and The Penguin, The Little Mermaid 2, Mulan 2, Hey Arnold: The Movie, The Rugrats Go Wild, All Dogs Go To Heaven 2, and All Dogs Go To Heaven Christmas Carol are examples of movies that I know aren't objectively good movies that are from my childhood (some I still like and enjoy and others not so much). The Swan Princess was a huge part of my childhood but so were a lot of these movies. I try not to let nostalgia come into a factor when I decide if a movie is objectively good and I still can say that I think The Swan Princess is objectively a genuinely good movie but that's just me.

I hate when people act like a favorite character of theirs' has no flaws and is some kind of saint, or justify their actions when their obviously doing something wrong. IMO that's not really being a fan of a character, that's turning a character into what you want them to be. Becuase the whole point of loving a character is to like them as is, flaws and all, and like pretty much everything about them. Plus I personally think flaws add depth to a character and make them a lot more human and relatable, and with out them a character is kind of boring, which is something that they don't take into consideration.

Everyone seems to love Beatrice and ships her with Wirt from Over the Garden Wall but I'm sorry, they had no romantic chemistry at all. Plus Wirt only saw her real form for a few minutes at best- he knew her as a bluebird for the majority of their time together. how could he have gotten a crush on her? She also seems older and definitely appears to view him in a little brother way. now, while she's a very good character, I still prefer Lorna (I'm sure you're all surprised) and I shipped her so hard with Wirt. They're so alike! It was very refreshing from the usual "they hate each other, now they love each other" ships we get. It felt like a punch to the heart when she didn't go with Wirt. I get she would've probably gotten in the way of the climactic ending but still. anyway, seeing more characters like her would be nice in fiction.

I don't get people who unironically do the Draco in Leather Pants thing. Liking villains is cool, no problem, but what appeal is there to turn a villain into an "innocent" softie, and remove any crimes he's done with excuses like "well he was possessed! he didn't know! it's all his dad's fault, he was abusive!"? I mean, come on, leave him as the evil asshole he is, we love him that way. (The Loki fandom is so guilty of these things, and they were always complaining about Thor abusing Loki, and Loki not appearing in every Marvel movie...it was a chore dealing with them back in the day). I'll admit, I do love me some male villains here and there (:)), but I just never understood the point of massively changing their personalities to that of a doomed romantic lover or erasing all of their flaws/the crimes they've done. It's just much more engaging to have a jerk doing jerky things, admitting them, and then doing different things. Makes the character more complex to me.

I actaully like Mickey Mouse a lot more than Bugs Bunny. To me Mickey's a lot more interesting, and more like a person I can relate to, even if he does live in a cartoon universe. Bugs just always came across as either boring and/or annoying to me, and a little too weird.

It's actually quite sad to say for a show so much loved for it's "gayness" , but the best and the healthiest couples of SU are the heterosexual ones (RosexGreg and StevenxConnie). Among the "popular" gay ships, RosexPearl is one-sided,PearlxAmethyst makes no sense, JapserxLapis and PeridotxJasper are abusive, heck, even the oh-so-popular RubyxSapphire, is not that great (this post explains it well : link )

I don't really ship Chel with Tulio. I sorta like her as a character because she seems interesting and complex (wish they'd given her more background) and she's amusing. However, it seemed like Chel and Tulio's relationship was thrown in to avoid the gay subtext of Miguel and Tulio, adding a heterosexual romance. Even though it seems Chel "gets in the way" of Miguel and Tulio's friendship and relationship, I still like her. Her relationship with Tulio seems based on lust and manipulation, maybe, more than actual trust, and it seemed rushed.

Bugs Bunny has more depth to him than people give him credit for. I mean, he willingly saved Hanzel and Gretel from being fattened up and eaten by Witch Hazel. He had nothing to gain from it and just did it out of the goodness in his heart, plus he ended up almost getting eaten himself. Plus in a military episode where they drew strings to decide who would do a dangerous mission, Porky has the longest one and has to do it. Bugs knock's Porky out, so he can take his mission instead because Porky had a wife and six piglets at home. Plus when he saved that hyperactive and fast talking little rabbit from the mountain lion was adorable. Plus when he helped that little penguin get home, even though it turns out it was the wrong home lol. I get that he's not a character for everyone, but I think he has more depth to him than people give him credit for.

Maleficent x Chernabog is the best Maleficent ship. Though her and the Horned King are cute, I much prefer him with someone like Aurora or Amalthea (yeah, it's kinda creepy and gross, but i love that "Death and the Maiden" aesthetic). I never liked Maleficent x Hades or Maleficent x Jafar. Also, is it just me, or does Disney LOOVE pairing up Maleficent? She got lots of ship tease moments with three different villains...Hmm...

I don't understand the trend of shipping the hero/heroine with his/her villain/villainess. But a lot of fans seem to love to do that. I mean why would and hero date a villain? Did the hero go bad or the villain reform? It's just never made any sense to me. Some examples of popular ones are; Jasmine x Jafar, Roger x Cruella, Batman x Poison Ivy, and Scrooge x Magica DeSpell; I'm always seeing fan art of these pairs.

(I feel like I confessed something similar to this before (( about Atlantis )) )

I wish there were more body/ethnic diversity in Disney movies, especially with women. The renaissance heroines like Ariel, Jasmine, and Megara have these really slim waists, and for Rapunzel, Elsa, and Anna, their heads all seem to be bigger than their waists, and their eyes take up half their face. Furthermore, 9 out of 13 (including Elsa and Anna) of the Disney princesses are white, and the Princesses of Color are each a different race from each other. That's why I'm excited for Moana.
I think the movie that has been the best for diverse characters is Atlantis: Dr. Sweet is black/Native American, Audrey is Hispanic, the Atlanteans are people of color; and all four (!) female characters have different body types. Big Hero 6 has also been pretty good. Honey Lemon and Gogo both have very different body types.
I also wish there were more heroes who are men of color in Disney films. I can only think of Aladdin, Shang, Hiro, Tadashi, Naveen (possibly), Kuzco, Kenai, and Mowgli. (Well, there are some side characters too, like Wasabi and Sweet)

Ok, as a person of color (Mizrahi/Ashkenazi Jewish) I get the importance of representation in media - in this case animation - and I try to practice what I preach.. you know, not whitewashing gifsets with PoC in them, and whatever. But I personally don't feel that every single character of color needs to be voiced by a PoC, or that PoC need to voice only characters of color (Walt Disney Confessions Rage on tumblr was trying to drag Aunt Cass from BH6 because she's a white character being voiced by a black actress, and somehow making Aunt Cass white is "erasure" to her voice actress... even though the character was created before her voice was chosen! Ugh...). I mean, it sucks that casting usually defaults to white actors and tends to reach out to PoC to add some exotic-ness (is that a word?) to the cast

But honestly? It doesn't really bother me, for example, that most of the voice actors in The Prince of Egypt are white, I thought they were all really well chosen for the characters they were playing. What mattered to me as a kid, and what still matters to me now, was seeing characters who looked like me for once... the dark skin and the curly hair and the noses. The background of the voice actors, whom you never even see in the movie anyway, doesn't really subtract from that experience for me.

I know this is gonna cause some hell and back, but I don't really like the term "POC". It just feels rather racist and dehumanizing. Not to mention very ignorant to lump all people, races and cultures into one term. And of course, it causes a fraction of "us vs them" mentality against the whites, which I'm not in favor either.

Derek from The Swan Princess isn't as bad as people make him out to be. I mean, he says "What else is there?" and quickly admits that it was stupid afterwards. He just didn't know what else to say because he wasn't good with words. A lot of guys aren't great with words and explaining emotional things. How is it when a female character is like this they are considered to be complicated or whatever, but if a guy is like this they are considered a jerk? Yes, there is the ugly duckling line, but two minor moments doesn't make him a jerk. Dimitri and Tony Starks are MUCH bigger jerks than Derek and they seem to be universally loved for goodness knows what reason.

I really don't get why people think Esmeralda and Pocahontas are sexualized. This is coming from a girl that gets offended when female characters are sexualized btw. Why just because they have big boobs? With Pocahontas, her dress is relatively shot, but its modest compared to what the women of her tribe actually wore IRL. She doesn't even act sexual or have fanservicey moments! With Esmeralda, I really don't see how she's sexual. That pole dancing scene wasn't really stripper like and that red dress wasn't really "skimpy", just a bit tight. I think Jasmine is more sexualized than them and she's a teen! I still like her though (She's actually been growing on me. One of the few sexualized females I like). Meg is more sexualized then them too.

I don't think Prince Charming, from Cinderella, was all that rude, when he yawned and rolled his eyes at girls at the ball. I mean the ball was something he had no interest in, that was forced on him by his father, and all he could was stand there bowing to girls that didn't interest him. So it's likely he'd be really bored. To me the yawn and eye roll doesn't make him awful, it just makes him human.

I really hope Alex Hirsch stops treating Mabel Pines (on Gravity Falls) as his Creator's Pet and lets Dipper call her out on her behavior the past 2 seasons. Selfishness, irrationality and impulsiveness would be fine, realistic flaws IF he would just treat them as such! instead Mabel generally gets away with everything while Dipper takes the blame (even when it isn't his fault). and of course the fandom defends everything she does, which drives me crazy. it's impossible to have a reasonable discussion about it, especially the rift incident, on tumblr or reddit without them going into Hyperdefensive Mode. It's like it's OK for Dipper, Stan, Pacifica, Robbie, and Ford to be wrong/jerks, but Mabel isn't.

Not necessarily unpopular, but it's something that really bugs me. It doesn't make any sense that some adult fans get pissed when people say ''animations just for kids'' or ''you must be a manchild for watching cartoons'', but think having more animated shows/movies with a more mature rating would be too inappropriate or whatever.

I can't stand the Looney Tunes, myself. I find them to be a bunch of unfunny, predictable hacks whose jokes get old and their characters have no warmth or charm to them. Plus, it irks me how people defend them when folks make a "Top 10 old racist cartoons" list, and these people will slam at Disney/Tom and Jerry for being racist/sexist, declaring them to be evil and satanic, but the Looney Tunes just get a slap on the wrist, despite the fact that their old cartoons showed as much racism/sexism as possible, perhaps even more than other animation companies. But people are always "Oh that was just a thing of the past! Everybody back then was like that! Plus Bugs is so charming!!!"

Ugh, f*** Bugs Bunny.

To talk of another thing...I don't get much of the appeal of Scooby Doo. I mean, i guess I liked it as a kid, but now it's just really kitsch and cheesy to me. I don't get how popular it is, what with getting reboots and remakes and spin-offs almost every year. Scooby Doo is THAT well-liked?

I don't think that just because a character is a bully that it makes them automatically bad. Don't get me wrong, I hate bullying, I've been bullied, and my number 1 WORST cliche is the one-dimensional bully. However, I do think that a bully can be given depth and have layers to them. I mean, Helga Pataki is a bully, but she has A LOT of depth to her. She is the way she is because she was made fun of when she showed feelings by her peers and didn't want to be made fun of. Plus her parents ignored her, favored her sister, her dad is an abusive hothead, and her mom is an alcoholic. That's a lot for anyone to handle, especially a 9-year-old girl. She even had to walk herself to school when she was 3 years old to preschool in the rain where she got covered in mud and her lunch was stolen by a mean ole dog. But she has a lot of depth to her. In one of my favorite episodes of Hey Arnold EVER, she wanted a pair of snow boots for Christmas and got them. However, she finds out that Arnold needs those same snow boots in order to find Mr. Hyunh's daughter that he had to give away to save her from a war in their country. She selflessly gave them up in secret to help Arnold reunite Mr. Hyunh with his daughter and didn't try to get anything out of it. Hey Arnold even has some other bullies like Harold, Torvalt, and Stoopkid that have a lot of depth to them. It does have some one-dimensional bullies, but the ones with depth balance it out. But I'll get into that in my video about my thoughts on Nickelodeon FINALLY doing The Jungle Movie and a reboot of the show.

Ariel was NOT a victim of abuse! I hate when Ariel is demonized, but I also hate when people demonize King Triton. He wasn't sexist towards her or really mean, he acted like a real parent. I saw nothing about him that was sexist. He doesn't hit her, insult her, or anything of any kind of abuse. He just wanted to protect his daughter because he loves her. One of the reasons I love The Little Mermaid so much is because it shows that, while both Ariel and Triton have different views, both also have good intentions, but go about it the wrong way. Triton wants to protect his daughter but does drive her away and let his temper get the best of him. Ariel wants to prove that not all humans are evil and to be part of their world, but no one was forcing her to go to Ursula. They were both at fault with the events that happened in the movie, but in the end, they do end up understanding each other. There is a lot of obvious love between them and they do truly care about each other. It drives me nuts how people find one to basically be an evil monster and yet excuse the other one as guiltless.

I hate how people like its big sin to not like any female characters. So what if I don't like any female characters from a certain movies, series, or franchise. I don't care if their the representation for the girls or strong female characters in a series, if their uninteresting or lame they won't appeal to me. There are some series where I just find the female characters boring like I really don't care for any of the female characters in Seraph of the End and some others I can't think of. A character's gender's shouldn't influence your likability for them and there actually people on here and tumblr who are like that. I have a good balance of both genders as my favorites.

Speaking as a fan of Phineas and Ferb I've never understood why Isabella is popular. I'm mean she's really nothing more than a one dimensional, boy crazy, piece of arm candy for Phineas. Especially when you consider that everything she does is to impress him rather it's trying one his inventions, earning merit badges, or saving the day.

Rapunzel is cute and charming in her own way, but she really isn't that good looking. Her eyes bug me, has a huge head, and she was designed to be more cute than beautiful.

I don't think that the new Lola Bunny has more personality than the original Space Jam Lola Bunny. I've heard people here on Fanpop don't like the Looney Tunes because their personalities are too over-the-top and all over the place. While I do see that to an extent, I still love them. However, the new Lola is all of that but taken to a maximum level. She has absolutely no identity outside of being a crazy stalker (with a brain smaller than a speck of dust) and Bugs' girlfriend. Yes, the original Lola was created to be Bugs' girlfriend, but she had more to her. She was smart, strong, competent, independent, kind, caring, sweet, feisty, a no-nonsense person, sassy, athletic, badass, and was a tomboy but was also feminine and unlike a lot of other tomboys didn't write off girly stuff as weak. Is her personality well-developed? No, but she was at least two-dimensional and was intended to be a good role model for girls and give them someone to look up to, especially since none of the Looney Tunes were really good role models. In the comics, she definitely was three-dimensional and was unique among the Looney Tunes. She was still looney, but was also competent and a good role model with a personality that wasn't all over the place. Plus I love how she was able to put Bugs in his place when he got overly-confident. The new Lola was just insulting writing and a HUGE step back for Lola. She was like a mixture of Isabella from Phineas & Ferb and Lena Hyena from Who Framed Roger Rabbit. One-dimensional and no identity outside of being man crazy. How ironic that a character with less then five minutes of screentime had more depth and personality to her than a character in a TV series with MUCH MORE screentime.

I really hope I don't get bashed for this like I did almost a year ago when I was obsessing over Lola Bunny. I'm really not in the mood to be in a fight, especially during my favorite time of the year.

I personally don't care whether a character is multifaceted or developed or whatever, and i don't really factor it into what draws me to anyone. And i think it's sort of become this way of separating good characters from bad ones, and i think that's kind of simplistic - there are a lot of less developed characters i love, and layered characters that i hate or don't consider "good" characters. All I care about is how convincing they are and whether they pull me into the story.

I like it better when the heroines have narrower eyes than the heroes (unless she's silly, immature, or cutesy than it's understandable, like say Anna, but seriously I feel like I'm the only one that likes this.) I think it would make more sense if Elsa and Tiana had narrow eyes (just to name a few). I also think there should be more female characters (that aren't considered ugly) with more prominent noses, or at least not the small button nose. I'm not talking about a huge ass nose, just a bigger one. I sometimes draw cute,small noses too, but drawing the same old big eyes/small nose cookie cutter look is boring. I like drawing different noses. Also as someone with a somewhat wider nose, I used to feel self conscious about it because bigger noses = ugly to a lot of people. I see Jasmine getting a lot of criticism for having a different nose, but I think it's cool and it seems like some shallow asses are saying you need to have a small nose to be considered attractive.

I care more about the stuff I watched as I got older than stuff I watched as a kid. The only TV show I watched as a kid that still has a special place in my heart is Xiaolin Showdown. I just don't really pay attention to what kids watch nowadays. If I do know about some it's because it's all over tumblr or something. (Which made me finally give in into watching SU)I know most Avatar fans watched it as kids, but I didn't watch it until I was 16. Also I know what I'm going to say is really dumb, but I also didn't want to watch it as a kid because it looked like an anime (even though it's not) and I didn't want to watch anime stuff. (Yet I liked Yu-Gi-Oh and Mew Mew Power. Probably I was too young to know they were anime?) (Also speaking of anime it wasn't until las year that I started giving it a chance) It's a good thing I finally started watching it because it's one of the best animated shows I've ever seen and it appeals to all age groups! Another thing, if I were to write and animate shows, I'd do animated shows for an adult audience because there isn't a variety of many western animated shows for adults as there are for kids. Also whenever I try to do family friendly stuff it ends up being half assed. I'm probably just rambling on about nonsense here.

I honestly mostly care about cartoons that I watched when i was young, aside from a few exceptions i care very little about modern cartoons that everyone obsesses over. Maybe I'm just getting old, but...(talking about all ages/kids' cartoons, since i do like different anime and movies and adult cartoons. It's stuff like Adventure Time or Steven Universe that i just can't get into).

I don't think Merida is all that attractive. I know a lot of people will say that's not unpopular, but it seems to be pretty popular here on Fanpop that's beautiful. Her hair is GORGEOUS and she has the most beautiful hair out of all the Disney Princesses in my opinion, plus she has a good and realistic body, but that's it. She's literally baby-faced, I don't mean baby-face as in young looking, I mean her face actually looks like it belongs to a 2-6-month-old baby. She's cute, but she's nothing special looking and definitely the least attractive of all the Disney Princesses. She may look unique but that doesn't mean she's beautiful just because she doesn't look like the typical beautiful girl. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but she looks like a baby that had it's face attached a grown up body. If it wasn't for her hair I don't think people would find her very attractive, I mean, just look at this picture of her I screencaped of her when the animators were constructing her.

I prefer the cookie-cutter look to the unconventional look. I know there have been people saying this isn't unpopular because they've been complaining about the opposite, but that's what makes me see this as unpopular here on Fanpop. Just because someone is unique looking it doesn't mean they're beautiful. I mean, it's one thing to make a character look different and unique, but it's another to go so extreme that they just look weird. I'd MUCH rather look at Ariel than I would Merida! I'd MUCH rather look at Tiana than I would Megara! I'd MUCH rather look at Belle than I would Jane! I'd MUCH rather look at Pocahontas than I would Nani! I'd go on with more examples but I'd just be beating a dead horse. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and I'm not trying to call anyone out or anything, but it seems like people are just tired of the typical beauty look and just want different looks, which is fine, but don't shame traditional beauties.

I have a weird opinion of CGI animation. I hate the way most CGI people look, they look very plasticky and like dolls to me. But for some reason I love the way most other things look in it. To me most non human things, like animals, plants or machines look a lot more "real" in CGI than 2D.

I don't like shipping Aisling and Brendan. i just feel they work so much better as friends/her as his guardian spirit of sorts, and anything resembling romance between them just doesn't work for me. Dunno some female/male relationships in fiction just work better as good friendships.

OTOH, I do like Lucille and Franceour as a ship a little bit...Yeah, I know it sounds gross, but in an AU of sorts where he's like, human'd or something, i feel it can work....Yeah judge me all you want. i know it sounds fucking sick. but don't care. ;)

Both of these are Steven Universe related so,I'm going to kill two birds with one stone here. Anyway I want to pull my hair out every time people see a gem and claim a race, especially if arguments start over it. Bitch no, those are gems. They're not even human or have an Earth ethnicity. They have ''skin'' and ''hair'' colors you don't see on white/black/latino/asian/etc. Rebecca Sugar herself said they aren't based off of any race. I do admit that I keep imagining Rose Quartz, I thought she was a white woman (she pretty much looks 98% human except for the pink hair)The other gems look more like gem people.

Also I think Garnet is cool and all, but shes got an awful figure tbh.